- Long-Form Video Editing
- Podcast Editing
- Short Form Editing
- YouTube Growth Partnership
30K to 303K subscribers in 13 months for Prof Steve Keen
We turned a channel doing 5K views and $5 subscriptions into a real business, not just a bigger view count.
How we actually helped Prof Steve Keen scale from 30k subs to 300k+ in almost 1 year.
Steve came to us with 30K subscribers and ~5K views/video. He had sharp economic insight and an audience that wasn’t growing. Thirteen months later, we ran every part of his channel and rebuilt it into a real business. This is what we did……
01. What we took over
We took the channel off his hands entirely.
- Content strategy and topic selection
- Titles and thumbnails creation
- Full editing of each piece of content
- 1-on-1 live recording sessions with Steve
- Posting and scheduling 2x/week
- A/B testing on packaging
- Distribution of shorts and highlights.
Steve’s only job was to be Steve. He showed up to record. We ran everything else.
02. What we changed, and why it worked
Growth isn’t one lever. It’s a system, where each fix raises the ceiling on the next. We built that system for Steve in order, because the order is what makes it compound.
Editing for comprehension.
Steve's analysis is some of the sharpest in economics. It's also complex, and complexity is where attention leaks. So we re-engineered every video around one job: making a hard idea easy to follow in real time by adding visual explanations as he reasons, animation on the concepts words can't carry, B-roll that shows the point instead of telling it. The effect was mechanical: people stopped dropping off mid-explanation, and average view duration climbed. AVD is the signal YouTube weighs most heavily. If you are able to hold attention longer, the algorithm hands you more reach. That reach is the base everything after this was built on.
Packaging built on evidence, not instinct.
Content is wasted if no one clicks. So we went after the click-through rate directly and we treated it as data, not taste. Every title and every thumbnail was A/B tested element by element, and every result was logged. Those results became a playbook: a documented library of the exact title and thumbnail patterns that won for his audience specifically. From that point onwards, we weren't creating the packaging from scratch each upload, we were deploying formats we already had proof would convert. That's what let the channel accelerate its growth.
Strategic topic selection for the audience.
The best package on the wrong topic still fails. So before every single video was planned, we found the demand. We studied the conversations his audience was already having, the recurring questions, the arguments, the threads with the most heat, and built videos against that demand. Right topic, proven package, retained viewer: three multipliers stacked on the same upload and performance stopped being luck.
Production we directed.
The final variable was the raw material itself and most teams accept whatever they're handed. We didn't. We removed the handoff entirely and produced Steve directly, in 1-on-1 sessions where we shaped the angle, the structure, and the framing live, then recorded it exactly to strategy. We weren't improving footage after the fact. We were directing what got captured in the first place.
03. What it became (13 months)
And that $25.9K is only the ad revenue, the subscriptions, courses, and leads that the channel now drives are a far bigger story.
He didn't post more or change who he is. He stopped running the channel and let us grow it.
If you’re the bottleneck in your own channel, that’s exactly the problem we take off your plate.
30 minutes · we’ll map what’s capping your channel · no pitch.
And Steve Isn’t the Only One…

ProfSteveKeen
303K subscribers
480k views vs 50k Avg

ProfSteveKeen
303K subscribers
480k views vs 50k Avg

Andy Coleman
13.9K subscribers
270k Views Vs 10K Avg

BE AMAZED
13.5M subscribers
550k views vs 200k Avg

Dr. Kam DPT
2.26K subscribers
21k Views VS 200 Avg

Denzel Gaynor
898 subscribers
16k views VS 2k Avg

ProfSteveKeen
303K subscribers
480k views vs 50k Avg

ProfSteveKeen
303K subscribers
480k views vs 50k Avg

Andy Coleman
13.9K subscribers
270k Views Vs 10K Avg

BE AMAZED
13.5M subscribers
550k views vs 200k Avg

Dr. Kam DPT
2.26K subscribers
21k Views VS 200 Avg

Denzel Gaynor
898 subscribers
16k views VS 2k Avg
Why most channels never break out

Meanwhile the data is right there: what the audience wants, which topics pull, which packaging converts. But mining it, testing against it, and improving every week is a full-time job. The creator already has five. That sixth one, the one that actually drives growth, never gets done.
So we build every open to do three things, fast: pay off the promise your title made, prove why you're worth watching right now, and plant the open loops that only close at the end.

So the channel plateaus. Effort goes up, results don't. And eventually the most common ending in all of YouTube: the creator burns out and quits; convinced the problem was them, when the problem was that nobody was operating the channel like a system.

Growth isn't talent. It's an operation and it requires someone to pull the data, read what the audience is telling you, test what the numbers suggest, double down on what wins, and run that loop every week without fail.
That's the difference between a channel that stalls at 30K and one that compounds to 300K and above. It's not about more effort, it's about the system that was missing.
That's exactly what we built for Steve. And it's what we run for every creator we partner with.
Hear it from the creators
The numbers are real, so are the people behind them. This is what it’s actually like to work with us.
Zeeshan and the team have been a huge part of our recent growth. Over the last few months, our views have risen tremendously, and we’ve started surpassing previous months faster than expected. The consistency, execution, and results have been incredible.

Prof. Steve Keen
Education / Economics Creator
30 minutes · 2–3 specific fixes for your channel · no pitch.
Why do creators hand us their channel?
You can keep running it alone, most do. Here’s what changes the day you stop.
Doing it yourself
- You're the strategist, editor, and producer at once
- Decisions made on instinct, not data
- No system to measure what worked or repeat it
- Growth depends entirely on your time and energy
- Eventually: burnout, or a plateau you can't break
- A full team runs the channel end to end, you just create
- Every decision driven by data, not guesswork
- A tested playbook of what wins, repeated and scaled
- Growth that compounds without depending on you
- We own the outcome - your growth is our job
What changes with us
How the partnership works
Four steps from your first call to a channel that grows without you running it.

The strategy call
We show you whatyour data is already telling you what's cappinggrowth, where the opportunity is. No pitch, no obligation.

The audit & the plan
The audit & the plan We audit the whole channel and build the growth strategy. You see the exact plan and approve the direction - before anything starts.

We run it, every video
Strategy, topics, titles, thumbnails, editing, production, posting - daily, consistently. You step back into the one role that's yours: creating.

We test & compound
Every video, we A/B test what moves performance and log what wins building a playbook for your audlence, so the channel keeps getting better.
Book your free strategy call
We take on a small number of creators at a time, so we can run each channel like it’s our own. Tell us about yours and we’ll see if it’s a fit
- You're between 30K-300K subscribers
- You're posting consistently but plateauing
- You’re ready to hand off the operation, not micromanage it.

Prof Steve Keen
30K ➜ 303K in 13 months
Tell us about your channel
frequently asked question
Everything except content creation/recording. We handle content strategy, topic research, editing, titles, thumbnails, A/B testing, scheduling, and distribution. You show up to record. That's your job. We take everything before and after the recording off your plate entirely and nothing goes live without your approval first.
Most agencies genericize creators because they don't put in the work to understand them first. Before we touch anything, we spend serious time mapping your voice, your references, your red lines, and your audience's specific language. The goal is for your channel to feel more like you, not less. Prof Steve Keen is one example.
Prof. Steve Keen is the biggest case study we share, but the system isn't built around his niche, it's built around the underlying mechanics of what YouTube actually rewards: retention, packaging, and topic-market fit. Those don't change between an economics channel and a fitness channel or any other niche. What changes is how we apply them, and we build that from scratch for every creator we partner with. We don't deploy a template. We build a custom playbook.
We'll be straight with you: channel growth from a standing start compounds over months, not weeks. The first 60 to 90 days are where we build the system, in simple words, the playbook including the A/B testing baseline, the audience research and more. The acceleration comes after that. That's why we work on a 6-month contract, not to lock you in, but because anything shorter isn't enough time to see what the system actually does. We wouldn't take you on if we didn't believe in what we can build for your specific channel.
We keep our partnership roster intentionally small. This kind of work i.e 1-on-1 recording sessions, weekly strategy, full A/B testing, can't be done well at scale. We won’t take you on if we don’t have the capacity to grow your channel. If we don't, we'll say so.
They'll notice the channel got better. The transition is gradual and deliberate, we don't flip a switch and change everything overnight. We study what your existing audience already responds to, and we build on that. The channels that feel jarring after an agency takes over are the ones where the agency didn't listen. We do.
We go through your channel with you including the recent performance, what the data says about your audience, where the ceiling is, and what the first 90 days would look like if we partnered. You'll leave with a clear picture of the problem and a specific plan for fixing it, whether you work with us or not. It's a strategy conversation, not a sales pitch.


